Extradition is the main mechanism of international law to ensure justice and cooperation between States in confronting organized crime. It allows one country to hand over an accused or convicted person to another country for trial or execution of a sentence. Let us look at the basic concepts and types of extradition, international agreements, principles and procedures, and grounds for refusal to grant it.
What is Extradition?
Extradition is the legal process by which one State, at the request of another State, surrenders a person accused or convicted of a crime for prosecution or execution. The process is regulated by international treaties, conventions and the domestic laws of States. Extradition facilitates international cooperation in combating transnational crime, terrorism and other serious offenses.
The Legal Basis for Extradition
The legal basis for extradition is formed on the basis of international treaties, conventions and national laws. These normative acts establish the conditions and procedures for the transfer of persons, as well as define the categories of offenses subject to extradition.
What are Extradition Treaties?
Extradition treaties are bilateral or multilateral agreements between States establishing the conditions and procedures for the surrender of persons accused of committing crimes. These treaties define the list of offenses subject to extradition, as well as the exceptions and conditions under which extradition may be waived. Examples of such treaties include the Budapest Convention and various bilateral agreements between countries. For example, an extradition law firm in Thailand drafts and analyzes such treaties, ensuring that they comply with international standards and national law.
International Conventions
International conventions fulfill the main task in regulating extradition. One of the most significant is the European Convention on Extradition (European Extradition Convention), which sets standards for the transfer of persons between member states of the Council of Europe. Other important conventions include the UN Convention on the Transfer of Criminals and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which contain provisions concerning the rights of persons subject to extradition. These instruments provide a legal framework for extradition procedures, guaranteeing respect for human rights and preventing arbitrary or politically motivated extraditions.
Domestic Laws
Each State has its own domestic laws governing the extradition process. These laws define the procedures for filing and considering extradition requests, as well as the conditions under which extradition may be granted or refused. Domestic laws also ensure that the rights of accused and convicted persons in the extradition process are respected, including the right to a fair trial and protection from torture and inhuman treatment.
An extradition law firm can provide expertise on the compliance of extradition requests with domestic laws and international standards, if necessary.
Key Principles of Extradition
The extradition process is based on several key principles that ensure the fairness and legality of the transfer of persons between States.
Double criminality
The dual criminality principle requires that the act for which extradition is sought be an offence in both the requested State and the State in whose territory the accused is present. This ensures that extradition applies only to acts criminalized in both States. Dual criminality prevents the use of extradition proceedings to prosecute persons for acts that are not criminalized in the host country.
Non-extradition for political offenses
According to this principle, extradition cannot be granted for offenses of a political nature. This exception protects individuals from the use of extradition for political purposes, such as prosecution for expressing political views or engaging in political activities. International law clearly prohibits extradition for political offenses, protecting the rights and freedoms of the accused.
Special doctrine
The special doctrine implies that extradition should be granted only if there is sufficient evidence of guilt and all procedural requirements are met. This includes the need to verify the legality of the request, whether the offense meets the dual criminality requirements and whether there are no grounds for refusal. The special doctrine ensures that extradition is granted only when there are objective and legally justifiable grounds, protecting the rights of the accused and preventing arbitrary extraditions.
If you have problems related to the above, we recommend you to contact an experienced lawyer Konstantin Zivla. She is a prominent lawyer who will protect your interests by providing the necessary legal arguments and evidence in your favor.
The Extradition Process
The extradition process involves several stages, each of which requires strict adherence to legal procedures and international standards:
- Filing an extradition request: the State accusing a person of committing a crime sends a formal extradition request to the State where the accused is located. The request is usually transmitted through diplomatic channels and must contain detailed information about the identity of the accused, the nature of the charges and relevant evidence, including an arrest warrant;
- Consideration of the request by the receiving State: the State receiving the request conducts a check for compliance with the terms of international treaties and its own legislation. This includes assessing dual criminality (i.e. whether the act is recognized as a crime in both States), as well as verifying that procedural requirements have been met and that there are no political motives;
- Legal proceedings: the case is referred to the judiciary or competent authorities for detailed examination. The court assesses the legality of the request, the sufficiency of the evidence presented and whether the rights of the accused are respected. Possible grounds for refusing extradition, such as risk of human rights violations or refugee status, are also considered;
- Decision on extradition: a decision to extradite or refuse extradition is made on the basis of judicial proceedings. In some countries, the final decision may require the approval of the highest state authorities or the executive branch;
- Enforcement of the decision and transfer of the accused: If the decision is positive, the transfer of the accused to representatives of the requesting State is organized. This includes coordination between the law enforcement agencies of both States and ensuring safe transportation;
- Appeals and legal remedies: The accused has the right to appeal the extradition decision to higher courts. The appeal process may result in a delay or review of the original decision.
Each of these steps aims to ensure that the process is fair and that the rights of all parties involved are protected in accordance with international norms and standards.
Grounds for Refusal of Extradition
There are several grounds on which a State may refuse to extradite an accused or convicted person. These grounds are aimed at protecting human rights and preventing the unfair use of extradition.
Political or military crimes
Countries may refuse to extradite persons accused of political or war crimes. This is because extradition for such crimes can be used for politically motivated prosecutions or to increase repressive measures against the opposition.
Risk of torture or inhuman treatment
One of the key grounds for refusing extradition is the risk that the accused will be subjected to torture or inhuman treatment in the receiving state. International conventions, such as the UN Convention against Torture, prohibit the extradition of persons if there is a well-founded fear that their life or liberty will be violated as a result of ill-treatment.
Double jeopardy
If a person has already been convicted or acquitted of the same offense in another State, extradition may be rejected on the basis of the principle of double jeopardy. This principle prevents repeated prosecutions for the same act by providing protection against duplicative punishment.
Challenges to the death penalty
Countries that have renounced the death penalty may refuse to extradite persons requested by States where the death penalty is a lawful penalty. Such States may invoke the prohibition on extradition of persons on death row to avoid engaging in practices that are contrary to their domestic legal norms and international obligations to protect human rights.
How extradition lawyer can help you?
The extradition process is complex and multi-stage, requiring a thorough understanding of international law and procedures. An extradition lawyer can provide the necessary support and defense at all stages of the process. Lawyers at Interpol Law Firm have considerable experience in international law and extradition procedures who can provide qualified legal assistance and protection of your rights.
Our extradition lawyers will conduct a comprehensive analysis of the extradition request, assess its compliance with international and national regulations, and develop a defense strategy. Our team of Interpol lawyers will represent your interests in courts and negotiations, ensure compliance with all procedural requirements and protect your rights at every stage of the process. In addition, they will consult you on possible grounds for refusal of extradition and help you prepare the necessary documents and evidence.
